Supreme Court On Petitions Against Bihar Caste Survey

'Publicity Interest Litigation': Supreme Court On Petitions Against Bihar Caste Survey

A bench of Justice BR Gavai and Justice Vikram Nath was listening to the petition.


The Supreme Court immediately refused to entertain requests towards the caste survey in Bihar. Calling it “publicity curiosity litigation”, the courtroom questioned why did not the petitioners go to Patna High Court on this matter. Three petitions have been filed within the Supreme Court towards the caste headcount — one by an organisation known as Ek Soch Ek Prayas, proper wing outfit Hindu Sena, and a Bihar resident known as Akhilesh Kumar.

“So this can be a publicity curiosity litigation. How can we situation instructions on how a lot reservation needs to be granted to such and such caste. Sorry, we will not situation such instructions and might’t entertain these petitions”, the bench, comprising Justice BR Gavai and Justice Vikram Nath, advised the counsel for petitioners.

Notably, this situation was already heard within the Patna High Court when the petitioner’s rivalry that the state is conducting a caste-based census was rejected on the bottom that the official notification on this regard says it is a caste based mostly ‘survey’.

Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar welcomed the courtroom’s choice. “Some individuals had been making an attempt to cease it. They have been confirmed flawed,” he stated.

Hindu Sena has stated in its petition that the Bihar authorities desires to “break the integrity and unity of India” by conducting a caste census.

There has been a requirement to cancel the notification issued by the state authorities on June 6 for the caste survey in Bihar.

Akhilesh Kumar’s petition states that the official notification and the method are “unlawful, arbitrary, irrational, unconstitutional and with out authority of regulation”.

“The Constitution of India prohibits discrimination on the premise of race and caste. The state is below a constitutional obligation to get rid of caste strife and racial strife,” the petition stated.

The petition additionally questions whether or not the Constitution of India has given the state authorities the appropriate to conduct census on the premise of caste.

Seven questions have been raised on this petition earlier than the Supreme Court.

  1. Is the Bihar authorities taking motion to conduct caste census a violation of the essential construction of the structure?
  2. Does the Constitution of India give the state authorities the appropriate to conduct caste census?
  3. Is the notification issued by the Deputy Secretary to the Government of Bihar on June 6 towards the Census Act 1948?
  4. Is the notification of caste census, within the absence of regulation, legally legitimate?
  5. Is the state authorities’s choice to conduct caste census supported by all political events?
  6. Is the choice of political events on caste census binding on the federal government for Bihar?
  7. Is the Bihar authorities’s notification of June 6 towards the Supreme Court’s structure bench’s choice within the Abhiram Singh case?

On January 11, the highest courtroom had stated that it might take up the matter on January 20, after one of many petitioners talked about an pressing itemizing of the matter.

Featured Video Of The Day

Do Women In Sports Remain Vulnerable?

Source link

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Shopping Cart